12 Comments
User's avatar
Juan Jose Gomez's avatar

It sounds very interesting, Alejandro. A small demo would be extremely useful!

Expand full comment
JonathanR's avatar

There look to be examples in the repo, that you can play with 🙂

Expand full comment
Juan Jose Gomez's avatar

Thanks😃

Expand full comment
Alejandro Piad Morffis's avatar

Yup, just a few tiny examples for now but I'm working on better documentation.

Expand full comment
VK's avatar

Thanks for the article. Looking forward to installing and experimenting with the framework. Your articles explaining more of the framework - it's design, usage etc., will be incredibly helpful.

Expand full comment
Alejandro Piad Morffis's avatar

Thanks for the feedback :)

Expand full comment
JonathanR's avatar

This is extremely interesting and something I am also experimenting with at the moment. Will definitely take a look at ARGO

Expand full comment
Alejandro Piad Morffis's avatar

Thanks! Happy to hear your thoughts and suggestions when you give it shot :)

Expand full comment
Mikael's avatar

Thank you for your text. You argue that reasoning requires structure. Interestingly, there are different approaches to this. Will think more, and share my thoughts :-)

Expand full comment
Alejandro Piad Morffis's avatar

Thanks! I don't know if I'd go as far as to claim all reasoning requires structure. But at least I think is arguable that some forns of reasoning do benefit a lot from structure. Math and logic come to mind as perhaps obvious examples. And even if structure by itself doesn't actually improve the reasoning capabilities of LLMs (however thin and fragile those may be), at least it does help a lot with verification.

Expand full comment
David Sutherland's avatar

I'm totally on board!

Expand full comment
Alejandro Piad Morffis's avatar

Thanks! All suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Expand full comment